Before diagnosing bias or variance, establish what level of error is reasonably achievable. This baseline helps determine if training error is genuinely “high” or acceptable given task constraints.
Key Insight
Don’t evaluate training error in isolation - compare against achievable performance levels.
Best for : Unstructured data (audio, images, text)
Example : Speech recognition where humans achieve 10.6% error due to noisy audio
Humans excel at pattern recognition in natural data
Previous implementations
Competitor solutions
Industry benchmarks
Published research results
Domain expertise
Historical project performance
Theoretical limits
Business requirements
Without Baseline
Training error: 10.8%
Appears high, suggests bias problem
May lead to wrong optimization approach
With Baseline (10.6%)
Training error: 10.8% (only 0.2% above baseline)
CV error: 14.8% (4% gap from training)
Correctly identifies variance problem
Zero baseline : Appropriate for tasks requiring perfect performance
Non-zero baseline : Realistic for noisy data applications
Speech recognition with background noise
Medical diagnosis with ambiguous cases
Image recognition with poor quality inputs
Real-world data often contains:
Noise : Background sounds, visual artifacts
Ambiguity : Multiple valid interpretations
Missing information : Incomplete data points
Human limitations : Tasks exceeding human capability
Compare training error to baseline (not absolute threshold)
Measure gap between CV and training error
Use baseline-relative metrics for decision making
Baseline: 5%
Training: 15% (10% gap)
CV: 16% (1% gap)
Conclusion : Focus on reducing bias
Baseline: 5%
Training: 6% (1% gap)
CV: 15% (9% gap)
Conclusion : Focus on reducing variance
Measure human performance on representative samples
Research published benchmarks for similar tasks
Test existing solutions on your specific dataset
Ensure baseline uses same evaluation metrics
Test on similar data distribution
Account for task-specific constraints
Consider resource limitations (time, budget)
Setting an appropriate baseline transforms bias/variance analysis from guesswork into data-driven decision making, leading to more effective algorithm improvements.