Skip to content
Pablo Rodriguez

When To Use Decision Trees

Both decision trees and neural networks are powerful algorithms, but they excel in different scenarios. Understanding when to use each is crucial for effective machine learning.

Tabular Data Champion

Best suited for: Data that looks like a spreadsheet

Examples of good applications:

  • Housing price prediction: Size, bedrooms, floors, age
  • Customer segmentation: Demographics, purchase history, behavior metrics
  • Financial modeling: Income, credit score, debt ratios
  • Medical diagnosis: Lab results, vital signs, patient history

Data characteristics:

  • Rows: Individual examples/records
  • Columns: Features with clear meanings
  • Mixed types: Categorical and continuous features
  • Moderate size: Hundreds to millions of examples

Fast Training

Quick iteration cycles

  • Enables rapid ML development loop
  • Faster model experimentation
  • Quick prototype development

Human Interpretability

Small trees can be understood

  • Visualize decision paths
  • Explain predictions clearly
  • Regulatory compliance easier

No Feature Preprocessing

Handles mixed data types

  • Categorical and numerical features
  • No normalization required
  • Robust to outliers

Poor for unstructured data:

  • Images: Pixel data doesn’t fit tabular format well
  • Video: Temporal and spatial complexity
  • Audio: Signal processing challenges
  • Text: Language understanding requirements
Works on Everything

Effective for:

  • Tabular data: Competitive with decision trees
  • Unstructured data: Superior to decision trees
  • Mixed data: Combines structured and unstructured components

Clear winners for:

  • Computer vision: Image classification, object detection
  • Natural language processing: Text classification, translation
  • Speech recognition: Audio to text conversion
  • Time series: Complex sequential patterns

Universal applicability: Works across all data types Transfer learning: Leverage pre-trained models Complex patterns: Handle non-linear relationships effectively Scalability: Performance improves with more data

Slower training: Large networks take significant time Black box: Harder to interpret decisions Data hungry: Often need large datasets Preprocessing: May require feature normalization

  1. Data type: Tabular/structured data
  2. Speed priority: Need fast training iterations
  3. Interpretability: Must explain model decisions
  4. Small datasets: Limited training examples
  5. Quick prototyping: Rapid experimentation needed
  1. Data type: Unstructured (images, text, audio)
  2. Performance priority: Maximum accuracy needed
  3. Large datasets: Abundant training data available
  4. Transfer learning: Pre-trained models available
  5. Complex patterns: Non-linear relationships

Recommended approach: Use XGBoost for most applications

  • Superior performance: Better than single decision trees
  • Reasonable speed: Faster than large neural networks
  • Good defaults: Works well out-of-the-box

Exception: Use single decision tree only with severe computational constraints

Consider carefully:

  • Computational budget: Large models expensive to train
  • Data availability: Need sufficient training examples
  • Transfer learning opportunities: Pre-trained models available?

Credit Scoring

  • Features: Income, credit history, debt ratios
  • Winner: XGBoost/Decision Trees
  • Reason: Interpretability + performance

Image Classification

  • Winner: Neural Networks
  • Reason: Superior pattern recognition

Neural networks advantage: Easier to integrate multiple models

  • End-to-end training: Train entire system together
  • Gradient descent: Unified optimization approach

Decision trees limitation: Each tree trained independently

  • No joint optimization: Cannot train multiple trees together as easily
  • Integration complexity: More challenging to combine with other models

The choice between decision trees and neural networks should primarily be driven by your data type, interpretability requirements, and computational constraints rather than algorithmic preferences.